Top 5 Meta-Programs for Recruitment

See more details

Can you confidently say whether you trust yourself more than others? Or what matters more to you at work: the process or the outcome? Most people hesitate when faced with such questions. Yet, these preferences significantly influence workplace behavior. Although you can’t ask such questions straight up, a recruiter would find it useful to know the answers.

So, how can you analyze a candidate’s thought process during recruitment? This is where analyzing the interviewee using meta-programs comes in. In this article, experts share insights on meta-program interviews and when to use them effectively:

• Mariia Lunova, Senior HR Business Partner at GridDynamic.

• Yaroslava Pavlenko, Head of Recruitment at Mindy Support.

What are meta-programs and why are they useful for recruiters?

The concept of meta-programs originates from Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP). Meta-programs are internal filters that subconsciously shape how individuals perceive and interact with the world around them. In essence, they are our “built-in settings,” often unnoticed even by ourselves.

Meta-programs are widely used in recruitment, HR, coaching, and career consulting. Interviews based on meta-programs in recruiting aim to identify thought patterns and evaluate soft skills, providing insight into how a candidate might behave in specific situations — for example, whether they are likely to excel in a leadership role.

Meta-programs help recruiters in several key ways:

• Assessing the match between a candidate’s skills and the role’s requirements.
• Creating a detailed profile of the ideal candidate. This includes identifying which traits are “red flags” and which are strong indicators of a great fit for the team.
• Facilitating better communication with specialists and understanding which questions will better reveal the candidate’s mindset, strengths, and preferences.

Are meta-programs necessary in hiring? Traditional questions about a candidate’s experience may not always suffice to assess them. A specialist may face unpredictable challenges that require new competencies or prompt reactions. The meta-program test will help determine whether the specialist is ready for them.

How meta-program assessments work

You could directly ask a candidate whether they have leadership skills, but there are two potential issues:

1. The candidate might provide a socially desirable answer based on the job description rather than the truth.
2. Not everyone is fully aware of their own qualities.

Recruiters use special questions to determine a candidate’s meta-program profile. The questions must be formulated so that the candidate thinks about them and “shows” themselves in the answer. During the assessment, particular attention is paid to phrasing, recurring patterns, filler words, and other verbal cues.

In local Ukrainian recruitment, meta-program interviews are rarely used. Traditional biographical interviews and competency-based interviews are more common. However, experts recommend combining meta-program assessments with other methods to achieve the best results. First, it’s crucial to determine which meta-programs are critical for the role. Sometimes, a single question can address two or three meta-program profiles at once. For instance, asking candidates to share their professional achievements may reveal whether they are a team player, demonstrate initiative, and more.

Types of meta-programs and how to identify them

The NLP generally includes more than 40 meta-programs, but not all of them are relevant for recruitment. Here, we’ll explore the TOP-5 meta-programs that experts find most useful.

Internal vs. external reference

A person’s reference type determines what they rely on when making decisions. Generally, there are two types:

• Internal reference specialists are guided by their own opinion, vision, and position.
• External reference experts mostly rely on what others think.

👉 Questions to identify reference type:

1. How do you determine that you’re successful at work?
2. Can you share an example of a challenging situation you faced at work? What was the case, what actions did you take, and what conclusions did you draw?

Responses that start with phrases like “I feel,” “I think,” or “In my opinion” indicate a firm internal reference. Conversely, those with an external reference might say, “My manager believes,” or “My colleagues think.”

“Toward” vs. “away” motivation or commitment vs. avoidance

This meta-program identifies what drives a person to perform effectively:

• “Toward” motivation (Commitment): A specialist can set a task and control its quality independently. Such candidates thrive on positive reinforcement and perform better when they receive praise and recognition in the workplace.
• “Away” motivation (Avoidance): An individual requires external control and is motivated to avoid negative consequences if the task is not completed.

👉 A simple question to define a meta-program of motivation: “Why did you leave your previous job?”

Candidates with “away” motivation typically describe what they disliked about their previous company. In contrast, those with “toward” motivation will emphasize aspirations like a higher salary or career advancement.

Process vs. result orientation

The process/result meta-program highlights what a candidate focuses on:

• Process-oriented individuals excel in roles with repetitive tasks due to their attention to detail and thoroughness. While they may take longer to complete tasks, their work quality tends to be higher.
• Result-oriented individuals are faster, goal-driven, and flexible in achieving objectives. However, they often struggle with adhering to detailed instructions or routine workflows.

👉 Questions to ask:

• “What do you enjoy most about your work?”
• “What qualities define a successful person in your role?”
• “How did you achieve high performance in your previous role?”

For additional insight, ask the candidate how they would like to spend their vacation. Result-oriented people focus on the experiences they hope to gain, while process-oriented individuals provide a step-by-step outline of their planned activities.

Activity vs. passivity

Every individual leans toward one of these traits:

• Active individuals are proactive, take initiative, and assume responsibility without hesitation.
• Passive individuals prefer to wait for explicit instructions on how to do things.

👉 To determine whether a candidate will be active in work, describe a task related to the position (e.g., selecting the best employee or opening a new office). Then, ask the candidate how they would complete it.

Active professionals will say things like, “I will go/do/call.” Passive professionals will talk about involving managers and others to set and oversee the task.

💡 Expert Insight: The activity/passivity meta-program correlates with a professional’s maturity. Typically, the more experienced a person is, the more active they are. Companies value naturally active candidates who immediately show independence in their methods. This meta-program can be decisive for entry-level candidates as it indicates their growth potential. 

Individual contributor vs. team player

This meta-program reveals how well a candidate will integrate into a team and their preferred role. Individual contributors prefer to work independently, while team players actively engage and communicate with colleagues.

👉 A question to identify this meta-program: “Describe your greatest achievements.”

Team players will highlight team accomplishments, collaboration, and colleague support, while individual contributors will focus on themselves and their personal results.

Important: There are no “good” or “bad” meta-programs. Additionally, it’s rare for someone to display a single meta-program in absolute terms. A tendency toward a specific mindset can be a candidate’s strength for one position but a weakness for another role or company.

Relying solely on meta-programs to decide a candidate’s suitability is not recommended; a comprehensive approach is essential. However, meta-programs can be a highly effective tool during the process of candidate screening. They help to efficiently assess values of a candidate and reduce hiring errors.